image description

Companies with more financial analysts produce more and better-quality patents

Long-term growth in profits depends significantly on firms’ investment in innovation activities. However, firms may not invest in innovation in an optimal way. Some distortions arise because the decisions as to whether and how to invest in innovation are not only affected by their long-term expected benefits but also by other considerations.  A recent study conducted by researchers from the Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M), in collaboration with the Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), explores the role of financial analysts on firms’ innovation strategy and outcome. This study concludes that financial analysts can help companies to invest more efficiently in innovation and therefore produce a higher number of patents and of better-quality. 

There are two different effects through which financial analysts influence firms’ innovation activity. On the one hand, there is an information effect. Analysts collect firms’ information and provide it to the investors, for instance, by writing reports about company activities. By reducing the information asymmetries between firms and the market, analyst coverage can increase CEOs’ incentives to invest in innovation more efficiently. On the other hand, there is a pressure effect. Analysts discipline managers’ behavior through issuing periodic earnings forecasts. Missing the earnings forecasts is usually punished by investors. Since investments in innovation do not usually generate short-term income, managers have an incentive to cut expenditures in innovation when they have the pressure to meet analysts’ earnings targets. “There is a tension because financial analysts can have a positive as well as a negative effect on firms’ innovation decisions,” as explained by one of the authors, Anna Toldrà-Simats, from the Business Administration Department of UC3M. 

In the article, recently published in the Journal of Financial Economics, the authors identify the presence of these two effects and determine which effect dominates. “The positive information effect seems to dominate the negative pressure effect”, as highlighted by Anna Toldrà-Simats. “We have found that companies followed by more financial analysts are more likely to acquire other innovative companies, make corporate venture capital (CVC) investments, and reduce internal R&D expenses with little value added, which leads to a more efficient allocation of R&D resources”, adds another author, Bing Guo, also from the Business Administration Department of UC3M. 

Professor David Pérez Castrillo, the other co-author from UAB, indicates that “our study suggests that the disciplinary role of financial analysts leads companies to externalise their innovation activities, to make them more visible to the market. A certain level of supervision leads companies to make efficient decisions, also in terms of innovation”. The study concludes that financial analysts lead to a better allocation of companies’ R&D resources, an increase in the number of patents, and an improvement in their quality.